Mini Reviews101 – 110 of 137 |
|
Languidly progressing but intelligent movie about spelling and
spirituality. It's a strange combination but works surprisingly well thanks
to writing that doesn't belittle the audience. Flora's performance as the
master speller has similar quiet charm as Theo in Emile.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Events of the movie take place on a farm in 50's, where imigrants from
Mexico come help out during the summer. In the racist athmosphere of a
nearby town, the friendly relationship between Ira's big sisters and the
mexican workers is unpopular, especially among one young man who has been
pursuing one of the girls. A conflict between people of the two races
appears inevitable.
There are many lessons taught of tolerance and racism in this movie,
however the way they are presented may not hold the attention of an adult
viewer. Acting is in parts clumsy, in parts okay. The main character is
perhaps Ira (Kate Maberly), an eleven year old tomboy and the youngest
daughter of the family. When I first looked at the movie, jumping right
into the middle of it, I couldn't tell Ira's sex. However, I did think "If
that's a girl, she's a pretty one," and so started watching from the
beginning. I ended up becoming something of a fan of Kate, whom the role of
a tomboy suits well.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
aka Waterbomb for the Fat Tomcat
This can't really be a review, because the movie is in Estonian without
subtitles, and so I didn't understand any lines. It's a family or
children's movie, with correspondingly low-budget, mediocre-acting feel to
it. Undine and Zane do fine job for this type of movie however, and
especially Undïne (the older one, playing Marta) is easily notable enough
to deserve a modest recommendation. Zane does great job of being a very
cute little thing, especially with her charmingly unusual language. Score
2.5 – the average – for both movie and the actresses, because I didn't
understand the dialogue.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
One accomplishment of this essential drama from the 40s is its unusually
large and serious role for a child. Peggy plays Francie Nolan, a character
who is some two years older than the actress. Francie is one of the two
children of a poor family in Brooklyn, and adores her bohemian father
Johnny (James Dunn). Though capable of holding her own, Francie is also
sentimental and thoughtful, and makes a very likeable character. Her growth
from blind idolization of her father to coping with his flaws is one of the
major aspects of the story. Peggy's acting is good by the standards of the
time, and especially enjoyable if you prefer dramatic over merry. For a
more thorough review, I recommend the one at Eye For
Film.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Three years have passed since the events of My Girl. Vada (Anna) is now
thirteen, in that coming-of age. Wanting to find out more about her mother,
whom she never knew, Anna travels to Los Angeles, where the good-natured,
family-movie kind of drama of the film takes place. The strength of this
sequel is Anna, who is still much the same girl she used to be. Time has
passed however, Anna is now largely a teenager, and the movie fails to
capture the same magic as the first one. Watch this if you loved Anna in
the first movie, and don't mind seeing more of her even when she's older.
|
|||||||||||||||||
A simple story about poverty, following the family of a single father,
Bill, a good man who scarcely makes a living flipping burgers. His soft and
sweet-tempered daughter Willa, played by Jena, is diagnosed with
malnourishment. Willa's precocious and determined brother, proud like his
father, stops going to school in order to making money any way he can.
All this is told with deep sympathy and warmth. Bill and his children are
like any other family, just afflicted by acute lack of money. Jena's
portrayal of Willa, a tender girl who never complains or fights back, is
like many other roles of hers. While she has a decent amount of screen
time, most of her lines are short, and there are no long dialogues. Despite
that, by the end of the movie you'll feel like you've seen a glimpse of the
life of a real person that you've grown to care about. The same is true of
all the characters, especially Bill. Although the plot is rather too sparse
and the setting ordinary to a fault, you care about the characters, and
that makes the movie worth your time.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Neither all the fine child actresses nor the other rather big-name actors
of this family comedy are quite enough to save it from mediocrity, at least
unless the slapstick comedy by Steve Martin (playing the father) happens to
be your particular cup of tea. The difficulty of taking good screenshots of
this movie is a symptom of one of its bigger problems: with 12 kids and the
parents, there is no time to develop the characters enough even to warrant
closeups. Regardless, Alyson, Liliana, and Morgan make Cheaper by the Dozen
a worthwhile experience.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Peter McGowen is a playwright struggling with his latest text. He has
writer's block, his wife wanting a child is causing some marital friction,
and his neighbor's dog is keeping him awake at night. Another distraction
appears when they get new neighbors, who his wife invites over. Peter isn't
into socializing, and definitely doesn't want the neighbors' 8-year-old Amy
(Suzi) around making noise. It however turns out that his play has a child
character that doesn't convince the actors. Peter must study what children
are like, and so kindles a friendship with Amy. The subplot becomes an
important one, but not dominant. Amy, a somewhat physically disabled girl
with an over-protective mother, is a likable and real enough character, but
no more than that. Suzi's acting is very natural, and I think she'd have
had potential for far more than the role allowed.
I liked the wry humor of the movie, but at times the style deviated from a
realistic one into near absurdity, which was jarring. While the story of a
struggling playwright didn't touch me, Kenneth Branagh's excellent
performance as Peter was enough to carry the story.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Calling 2012 a "big budget catastrophe movie" doesn't leave much to add.
The inside of the Earth is heating up. Earthquakes, exploding volcanoes and
finally the mother of all tsunamis cause destruction of scale perhaps never
seen before. Otherwise the movie feels a fair bit like a re-make of
Dakota's War of
the Worlds. The hero is a divorced father, whose ex-wife has married a
more decent man. The kids, a boy and a girl, live with them.
Morgan plays the girl, Lilly Curtis. Like Dakota's Rachel, Lilly has a few
quirks. She likes to wear eccentric hats, and she wets her bed, despite
being 7. You can guess if she overcomes the latter, but the affection for
hats doesn't seem to have disappeared by the last scene, which is good,
because they really are very cute on her.
And all the destruction is just glorious.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Henry Poole is fatally ill, and moves into a new house to spend his
remaining days there in solitude. His neighbor sees the vague face of Jesus
in a water stain on his house's wall, however, and people start coming over
to see it. Miracles happen to people who touch the face, but Henry refuses
to believe in them. The central matter of the veracity of the miracles is
presented bluntly, rendering the movie largely pointless. While acting and
production values are fine, the dialogue is predictable, and it's hard to
care about the characters.
Morgan plays Millie Stupek, daughter of Henry's beautiful neighbor Dawn. In
the beginning of the movie Millie has been mute for a year, and doesn't
speak very much later on either. She has the classic role of a sweet child
in distress, and is a good fit for that. She's beautiful in a personal
manner, and gives a slightly mystical impression with her big eyes and
solemn silence.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Writing full reviews is an extremely time-consuming process. These are movies we've seen and want to comment on, but don't have time to write full reviews for. If you have any suggestions for movies you feel should be on this list, please let us know.
















